Inertial Impact Identity

Introducing the Inertial Impact Identity

Controlling Future Systems with Inertial Impact ID’s containing the Golden Ratio Proportion — A Coordinated Causal ‘Oath’ Experience

Controlling Time with a Coordinated Causal Oath Experience

A scientific way to identify a jurisprudential future system by being the cause.



 3D Cardioid

An Inertial Impact Identity contains the following properties:

 



Welcome, Please Click a Logo...

OSCC Logo3-25-16 - Inverted Color OSCC Logo

...To Declare the OSCC USA Constitutional Oath and/or A Causal-Mechanical Oath



1.

Citizen's Full Name & Address

2.

Citizen's Birth Place & Date

3.

Induction Sequence Number

4.

Golden Ratio Proportion Identifying Terms for the Directivity of Time

Golden Ratio Calculation:

7baccda4d2239ef71156a8a5ac4eadde


381264_10150996586810089_213984790088_21936749_1925341361_n

A = Constitutional Jurisprudence

Jurisprudence:  (1.) Problems internal to law and legal systems as such.  (2.) Problems of law as a particular social institution as it relates to the larger political and social situation in which it exists.

Answers to these questions come from four primary schools of thought in general jurisprudence:[3]

Natural law is the idea that there are rational objective limits to the power of legislative rulers. The foundations of law are accessible through human reason and it is from these laws of nature that human-created laws gain whatever force they have.[3]
Legal positivism, by contrast to natural law, holds that there is no necessary connection between law and morality and that the force of law comes from some basic social facts. Legal positivists differ on what those facts are.[4]
Legal realism is a third theory of jurisprudence which argues that the real world practice of law is what determines what law is; the law has the force that it does because of what legislators, judges, and executives do with it. Similar approaches have been developed in many different ways in sociology of law.
Critical legal studies is a younger theory of jurisprudence that has developed since the 1970s. It is primarily a negative thesis that holds that the law is largely contradictory, and can be best analyzed as an expression of the policy goals of the dominant social group.[5]

3 ^ Shiner, “Philosophy of Law”, Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
4 ^ Soper, “Legal Positivism”, Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
5 ^ Moore, “Critical Legal Studies”, Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy

B = Citizen Directive Oath & Causal-Mechanical Metric

I, (Name), witness my inertial impact identity and do affirm that it is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: I will support and defend the Constitution of The United States of America; and the Constitution of The State of Colorado; against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; that a historical moment and a system cycle function identifying terms for the directivity of time signal my willful intent to well and faithfully participate toward the furtherance of the Citizen Directive on which I am about to record: So help me Citizens.’

Causal-Mechanical Metric

First Axiom:
Time possesses a quality, creating a difference in causes from effects, this is detectable to a Citizen by identifying a jurisprudential system cycle with directivity or pattern.

Proceeding from those circumstances in which: 1) cause is always outside of the body in which the result is realized and 2) the result sets in after the cause.

Second Axiom:
Causes and results are always separated by space. Therefore, between them exists an arbitrarily small, but not equaling zero, spatial difference.

Third Axiom:
Causes and results are separated in time. Therefore, between their appearance there exists an arbitrarily small, but not equaling zero time difference of a fixed sign.

C = Resultant System - Terms for the Directivity of Time/System Cycle Function

Terms of essence, nature, substance or underlying medium; Essence, nature, substance –> Constitutional Rights and Prosperity; Jurisdictional Laws and Prosperity; Physical Laws; Nature;

Terms of utter equilibrium or non-composition, simplicity; Simplicity, simple, simplification –> System Comparison –> Fundamental Materials; Physical Processes and/or Reactions; Highest and Best Use;

Terms of Operation, Power, Cause, Natural Attribute or Property; Energy/operation, power, natural attribute, reason of nature, spermatic reason/logos, logos in the mind of god/undifferentiated reason/logos, etc. –> Jurisprudential System Cycle; Fundamental forces of nature; Causal Threshold Level; Constitutional Rights and Prosperity; Jurisdictional Laws; Inertial Impact Identity Card;

Terms of Composition, Results, Effects; Emanatory reason/logos, etc. –> Contracts; Causal Threshold Level; System Cycle Capacity; Citizen Directive; Causal Threshold Level;

Terms of Emanation, Mapping; Emanation, emanatory reason/logos, etc. –> Property Rights and/or License; System Location Coordinates; CitizenControl.org;

Terms of Return, or the “Reverse Engineering” of the Medium; Turn/Return, etc. –> System Dominance; Governmental Endorsement;

Terms of Temporality, the “Directivity of Time”